Solving the paradox for the left

The John McDonnell Column

WelfareBillCapitalism is facing an economic crisis but is not facing, in Britain at least, a political crisis. That is the paradox for the left. The political challenges that have taken place, whether trade union action or direct action like Occupy, may have released activist energies but they have not seriously challenged the political establishment so far. There are a number of potential reasons for this.

It may be that we are at the early stages of the implementation of the UK’s austerity programme and the worst of the suffering has yet to hit a majority of working class people.

It may be that there is a lack of belief that an alternative exists. The main opposition party is simply advocating a watered down version of austerity as the cure for the crisis.

It may also simply be timing. In the 1930s economic crisis there was an inevitable time delay between the initial shock of the crisis, the attempts by the existing institutions to tackle it, their failure, and the opportunity for alternatives to be mobilised and take serious hold in the popular consciousness. We may now be reaching the same timing in this cycle.

The effectiveness of austerity as a policy is now being questioned even among mainstream economic and political commentators. Polls show confidence is increasingly being lost in politicians who advocate austerity. The austerity measures and growing doubts about the political strategy being pursued by the government are creating an atmosphere for many of our people of both economic and political insecurity. They feel they have no control over their lives, no future.

This is the crisis of democracy. People are told they live in a democracy and yet are increasingly being taught by this recession that in reality they have no or little control over their lives.

Time for an Alternative Future

This is the time people are likely to seek an alternative future. The central question is how can people gain control over their lives? How can they overcome the precarious existence that they now experience? This is about redefining democracy from the narrow definition of an X on a ballot paper every few years to active, participatory democracy that enables people to take control of every aspect of their life.

If as socialists we want to convince people that there is an alternative to capitalism we have to demonstrate how each element of our system can be transformed so that we can take control of our lives. This new imagined future must convince people that daily life will be dramatically and, very concretely, different.

  • Waking up will be different for many in new affordable good quality, environmentally sustainable homes that they will have had a say in creating through their local housing programme and via their local council or housing co-op.
  • Going to work will be different as they use public transport for free, on an integrated system managed in common ownership by representatives of the workers who run the system, the passengers who travel on it and the wider community.
  • Life at work will be different because firms will be in co-operative ownership, socialised and selfmanaged or as a minimum operating with full trade union rights and workers’ representatives on every board.
  • For those that work at home with caring responsibilities there will be wages, not benefits, to ensure all work is respected and nobody lives in poverty.
  • Using public services will be different because each service will be managed locally by elected representatives from the workforce, patients, students, parents or service users and the local community.
  • Local decision making will be different as we break down the bureaucracies of existing councils and replace them with neighbourhood assemblies with direct democratic decision making.
  • Parliamentary democracy will be different as MPs become accountable to local assemblies and local people have the right of recall of their parliamentary representatives.

We must ensure that every institution and every practice in our society is reviewed and assessed to see if they meet the basic democratic principle of restoring to people control over their lives.

Crisis of Representation

There is clearly in the UK what many have described as a crisis of political representation. While for a period the Labour Party had some programmatic adherence to transforming our capitalist society into a socialist one, this has no longer been the case since at least Blair’s arrival. Certainly Ed Miliband has repeated regularly that he believes in a reformed capitalism, a responsible capitalism, a one nation capitalism.

The demand for an anticapitalist voice in Parliament may grow as the recession continues and the austerity measures hurt even more people. We must overcome this crisis of representation in every forum we possibly can and campaign and struggle within every institution of which we are part, including for me at least the Labour Party, to develop and promote the discussion about an alternative.

John McDonnell is MP for Hayes and Harlington and Chair of the Socialist Campaign Group of Labour MPs and the Labour Representation Committee.

This entry was posted in McDonnell and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Solving the paradox for the left

  1. dizzyingcrest says:

    Deficit reduction can be brought about in a number of ways the fairest would be to increase the burden on rich as there are huge amounts of wealth which can be unlocked through higher taxes through increases in Inheritance, direct tax , and council taxes upon the wealthy
    One can here the screams of the wealthy Conservatives of unfair and unjust but the point is that the uk is a rich country where wealth is held by the few but generated by the many. it is hard to imagine anyone who is self made in economic terms. All wealth is dependant on ordinary working people in the following ways Most company’s need workers to make a profit. Share markets banks etc need company’s to speculate on (Thus Workers). Retailers and wholesalers need customers to make a profit (workers). The aforementioned would suggest a large part of the deficit could be paid of using the above measures to unlock the wealth of the few that has been produced by the many.
    The UK after the Second World War faced huge debts but was still able to set up the NHS and bring about the Welfare State. This was brought about by massive taxes on top earners” maintained under the Attlee government, with the top rate of income tax reaching 98% in 1949).” Thus now may be time to slim down our fat cats

  2. dizzyingcrest says:

    The way we shape society is about choice we can have higher taxes on the wealthy or cut services and social security to the poor It is up to us how we start to pay the deficit down. Higher taxes on wealthy estates both council Tax , inheritance Tax and the transaction tax(Tobin Tax) look like a good idea . The only way to retrieve the enormous profits that company’s and individuals have Made over time out of ordinary peoples labour is through higher taxes. We cannot rely on a just benevolent attitude that does not exist. we should never forget that it is a myth that people are self made. To make an extreme point it may be argued that even the unemployed are necessary in a capitalist system to control wage labour
    It Cannot be right to cut the taxes of the wealthiest whilst services and social security are cut to the poor. It may be safe to reason that if the higher taxes placed upon the wealthy are used to help pay down the deficit then you may be able to reduce the burden on ordinary people thus leaving them some spending power to give the economy some impetus. The belief in low tax economies may be misplaced. As it may be suggested that they only seems to help the already rich and prosperous. If you look at America before the economic collapse one can see a low tax economy producing great wealth with the belief that this will somehow trickle down and every one will prosper. This would seem to be a myth as it would appear that a significant part of the population then and now lack sufficient medical cover and welfare

  3. Mike says:

    Higher taxes on those who can afford them is not a way to reduce the deficit, but also to expand socially useful projects – infrastructure, transport, healthcare, education, etc. It’s also important to create a more equal society for its own sake. Research shows that more equal societies are more likely to be happier with greater social solidarity and mutual respect.

  4. Briefing_Norrette says:

    I think there’s a typo and Mike meant to say: ‘Higher taxes on those who can afford them is not *just* a way to reduce the deficit, but also to expand socially useful projects’

  5. dan lambert says:

    Why would anyone need a trade union in a socialist society? Or for that matter wages?

  6. Briefing_Admin_Norrette says:

    Good point Dan. Yet I think we could only get there one step at a time?

    • dan lambert says:

      Norrette, if all those that in the past who have called themselves socialist had campained for, let’s say, the abolition of the wages system and for from each according to ability to each according to need, like Marx, Engels and Morris, we would have had socialism long ago.
      By campaining for something other the socialism you postpone it, do you not? Or are we humans who make up the working class of this world to dim to understand and achieve it?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s